Logo
District Information 2010 Master Plan: Moving Forward District Financials Enrollment Information Performance Management Press Materials Supporting Our Schools
Departments Business Services Educational Services Fiscal Services Food & Nutrition Services General Counsel Human Resources Maintenance, Operations and Facilities Section 504 Parent Rights Special Education Superintendent Student Services Teaching & Learning Technology Technology/Communications Committee
Schools 2016-2017 School Calendar School Performance (SARCS) Summer School 2016
Parent Resources 2016-2017 School Calendar 2017-2018 School Calendar After School Care and Activities Annual Registration Annual Registration FAQ District Parent Involvement Policy Health Information Parent Community Based Organizations Parent Handbook Rain Out Update School Choice/SES School Loop Log In School Menus/Purchase Meals Volunteering Immigration and Refugee Resources
Student Resources Homework Help Online Library Catalog School Choice/SES School Loop Login
Employee Resources Aeries.Net (Admin Staff) Aeries.Net (Teachers) Aesop (Absence Management) District E-Mail EADMS EmpCenter Employee Payroll Service Portal Employee Recognition Loan Forgiveness MOF Work Order (School Dude) Payroll Information School Loop Log In SharePoint SmartETools Staff Lunch Orders Technology Help Desk
Board of Education Agendas & Minutes Agendas & Minutes Archive Board Policies Advisory and Oversight Committees Documentation Archive

Litigation to Fix School Finance

On May 20, 2010, AUSD joined a broad coalition of plaintiffs and filed an historic lawsuit against the State of California.  The lawsuit, known as Robles-Wong, et al. v. State of California, alleges that the State's education finance system is unconstitutional and sought a judgment ordering the state to establish a school finance system that provides all students an equal opportunity to meet the academic goals set by the State.

Robles-Wong, et al. v. State of California was filed in the Superior Court of California in Alameda County.  Specifically, the suit asked the court to compel the State to align its school finance system—meaning its funding policies and mechanisms—with the educational program that the State has put in place. To do this, plaintiffs alleged, the State must:

  • Scrap its existing finance system
  • Determine how much it actually costs to fund public education to meet the State’s own program requirements and the needs of California’s school children
  • Develop and implement a new finance system consistent with Constitutional requirements.

The lawsuit was filed by a broad coalition of plaintiffs, including more than 60 individual students and their families, nine school districts from throughout the State, the California School Boards Association (CSBA), California State PTA, and the Association of California School Administrators (ACSA). Maya Robles-Wong, the named plaintiff, was a student at Alameda High School when the suit was filed. Alameda Unified School District is one of the plaintiff districts. Four Alameda families are also plaintiffs.

Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, the California Teachers Association filed an intervening complaint.

In response, the State filed a demurrer and motion to strike the two complaints, seeking to dismiss both lawsuits. The plaintiffs then filed their response. Judge Steven Brick heard arguments for and against the demurrer on December 10, 2010. The court dismissed the case on November 3, 2011.

On January 25, 2012, the plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal  to the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District, Division 3. They filed their opening brief on July 6, 2012. The Robles-Wong matter – docketed as A134424 – will be heard together with its companion case, Campaign for Quality Education v. California, case no. A134423. All briefing was completed in January 2013.

In January of 2016, the Court announced that oral arguments would be heard on January 27, 2016.

 

Sources: Stanford Law School, FixSchoolFinance.org

 

For additional information on this historic lawsuit, see links below: